Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Saturday, December 30, 2023

// // Leave a Comment

New Year Address of the Prime Minister of Change [DeepFake]

A new episode from the Arnoldifier series: "Arnold Schwarzenegger: The Governor of Bulgaria" https://github.com/Twenkid/DeepFaceLab-SAEHDBW 

Using my Arnoldifier (DeepfaceLab-SAEHDBW); Wav2LipHD-Super resolution, RealTimeVoiceCloning and DALL-E 3. Enjoy! Like, Share and Subscribe, of course! :))  

 https://youtu.be/AojlaVnjOJY



// Bulgarian political satire, "Сглобката", "некоалицията", ...  Невъзможната абсурдна коалиция.

Новогодишно обръщение на министър председателя на Промяната Кирил Петков - дийпфейк.
Read More

Sunday, August 7, 2022

// // Leave a Comment

Advanced deepfake fun - faces, TTS voice cloning, lip-syncing and upscale/face repair with deepfake finetuning: Arnold Answers Stoltenberg's Proposal for Bulgaria ...

Advanced deepfake fun: "Arnold answers NATO's Stoltenberg's proposals for Bulgaria", Part IV from the Deepfake series "Arnold Schwarenegger: The Governor of Bulgaria", demonstrating the custom DF library DFL-SAEHDBW for grayscale etc.



  • DFL-SAEHDBW - K.P. etc. to Arnold models
  • Select video, edit "stunt-double" sequences 
  • Original Script, Directing and humor,
  • RealTimeVoiceCloning, actors TTS
  • Wav2Lip lipsync; a modification for higher quality output (images per frame, not DIVX video)
  • Finetune DFL-SAEHDBW for repair and upscaling of the Wav2Lip output (it's original output is low quality with glitches and 96x96, the DFL models are 192x192 and high quality)
  • Merge improved lip-synced sequences
  • Recording an Easter egg cover song according to the script (LOL)
  • Editing, mixing
  • Release

  • Enjoy

  • To be Continued...

    #arnold #deepfake #machinelearning #parody #satire #nato #caricature


    Read More

    Saturday, July 28, 2018

    // // Leave a Comment

    Rising inequality and AI - a comment on something funny from notes from the AAAI 2018 conference



    A)
    From: https://david-abel.github.io/blog/posts/misc/aaai_2018.pdf 
    Seen in Montreal AI.
    p.14/82

    " His Take: When we reach the place where robots do takeover, what do we do? The concern: “those who own the robots rule the world”.

    Traditionalist Response: You see AI robots in the headlines, but not in the productivity or job statistics! Same with computers. Productivity growth in the 2010s is lower than in the last five decades. E/Pop is high, unemployment is low.

    Rising inequality began before AI as a result of
    measured factors: fall of unions, trade immigration. Dave: Wasn’t clear if it was “fall of trade, fall of immigration”, or “trade, immigration, and fall of unions” (my guess is the former)


    But: It’s actually really hard to measure productivity. The nature of productivity changes. If workers are now working more hours and taking longer commutes, it’s different from walking into a building getting clocked and walking out.

    (Bold: T.A.)
    B)
    Q: Why should this time be different?
    • Past fears that automation destroys jobs fizzled. FDR blamed the Great Depression joblessness
    on failure to “employ the surplus of our labor which the efficiency of our industrial
    processes has created”
    . US Commission on Automation, Rifkin’s End of Work (1995).
    ...

    "Those who own the robots..." - has some options in the cited paper.

    B) What a way to explain the failure of willingness to distribute the share, the consumption or to *create* jobs by changing the rules and re-thinking the way the profit is distributed.

    (Back in the Great depression time there was one famous US politician, a competitor of Roosevelt for the presidential election in 1932?, who had "wrong" ideas and rising popularity and was murdered by the "forces of nature", as one could guess).

    A) That sounds like an explanation for children to me. The neoliberal dogma of "trade" - "trade" blah-blah, "free trade", "the market" deciding everything. "The trade" in abstracto makes no sense, though.

    What about the neoconservatism-neoliberalism political movement in the 70s, the petrol crisis, the "crisis of democracy" in late 60s-70s, Margaret Thatcher in UK and Reagon in the USA.

    The fall (destruction) of USSR and the Eastern Bloc destroyed one of the pressures for the USA/Western Europe systems regarding the workers.

    What about the transfer of the production lines to East and South East Asia - to a much lesser extent in Central and Eastern Europe, which were "too expensive" for the investors.

    As of the immigration - it's supported by the opening of the borders for more and for cheaper workers (for higher profit), workers who are willing to work for lower wages - the countries' governments are supposed to decide and help or prevent this, it's not a "natural disaster" as it's suggested to children.

    In "democratic" countries those governments are supposed also to ask their citizens as well - I doubt Germans would have agreed with all the immigration they have received from the 40s until the latest decisions of their long-lasting "democratic dictatress".

    The immigration from Eastern Europe to Western and USA came: 1) because of the opened borders (in favor of the business in these countries) and also 2) largely because of the quickly destroyed industries after the "liberation from the socialism", see Bulgaria for example, to what its economy turned - from the biggest producer of computers and electronics in the Eastern Bloc and a huge producer of agricultural goods.

    (Note that the socialism is known as "communism" in Western Europe and USA (the "imperialist-capitalist countries"), although the rule  was never officially called "communism" by the "communists" themselves, except for the name of the parties. ).

    Besides the destroyed industry,  some of the countries national and social structure was smashed by the neoliberal "free" globalized media and political agents/non-governmental organizations applying "ideological diversion".

    That has been erasing the national awareness and belongings of the young people, they feel less attached  to their fatherland.

    Etc.


    Read More

    Sunday, March 20, 2016

    // // 1 comment

    AI Ethics | AGI Ethics and the ethics of the "emperors"' opinion about the danger of the thinking machines for the "survival of humanity"

    An answer to: Business Accelerated  - Meet Amelia, the AI Platform That Could Change the Future of IT: http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/245827


    English international ethics

    Just to mention how pathetic and inappropriately it sounds when an English professor in physics, sorry for being cynical - a bit caricaturically looking - is  cited as a "guru" who predicts and warns the world how dangerous AI is for the "future of humanity"... When his fellow "great" country England has conquered and robbed 1/4 of the world, starting from making their neighbour people slaves - the Irish and the others around. And they renamed their state "GREAT BRITAIN" - it's "Great England", mates and it's ridiculous when a country calls its own self "great".

    England was a threat for the "future of humanity", but we survived, even though we were hurt in many ways, for example by the English language - that ambiguous and morphologically primitive "lingua franca" that everybody is forced to speak today...

    US international ethics

    Similraly pathetic is when US scientists, engineers or enterpreneurs, usually not in the AI, like one electric-car enterpreneur make their guru-sayings and warn "the humanity".

    Why don't you say something about your fellow humans in your own fellow countries who "protect the world".

    The sources say that the US army has nearly 900 military bases around the world, and military personnel in 130 nations (data is circa 2011, as of the cited source, see below). All know about the NATO and USA military interventions around the world.

    Everybody knows the political obviousness that NATO is an American military institution and the EU is technically  an US overseas base.


    What about the USA + England + EU  nuclear weapons potential?* That includes France, Germany - tha latter is not an independent country, BTW, it's USA protectorate since World War 2, assisted by France and England that also have military bases in Germany for the last 70 years.

    These military forces serve for PEACE, aren't they!?

    These civilized militaries kill only aboriginal people, only Afghan, Libyan, Iraqi etc. - or other "proven" to be terrorists!!! Including the millions children and civilians.

    Historically the Africans, Indians (both in Asia and in America), Australian, Arabic, Asians, ... had a similar fate.

    Well, but "the humanity" as a "race" survives! So these wars do not threaten "our" (THEIRS) survival, they are "ethical" - for democracy, for freedom!!!!

    We (they) live in a beautiful world!!!!

    ...


    Message to the "ethical" US and English scientific and engineering pseudo-gurus


    Overall, dear USA and English scientists, please, keep your pretentious "expertise" in your narrow sciences. Do keep solving equations or exhausting combinations (one of the aspects of "research") or "solve problems" - these are fields where you are good, but computers also do since they were invented.

    You are politically and socially infantile though.

    Your "ethics" is "unethical" and insulting to the rest of humanity, which is not yet tamed and "educated" by your ideology, or which is just among the ones who are serving you, as the poor countries which are and would remain poor, as long as they are paid cents for making hundreds of dollars profits for their overseas "ethical" and "civilized" owners.


    Your political leaders do not have a clue about HUMAN ethics and HUMAN-relations out of the list of violent and master-slave ones such as:

    - Conquer
    - Enslave
    - Exploit
    - Believe that you are "God", you can do whatever you want with the people of the other countries (English "bug" - there's no plural for "народ", folk, as Bulgarians, Germans, Russians; "nation" is different, Bulgarians were Bulgarians without having a nation state, etc.)
    - etc.

    English-USA political psychology as of the one of any imperial countries like the West European ones (France, Spain and Portugal in the past, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, ...) is suffering  a  hypertrophied feeling of superiority over the "aborigenes" around the world.

    Their political international ideology is of the MASTER-and-the-SLAVE.

    They are the "masters", the others, according to their believes, are supposed to be the "slaves" and the must obey - see how the TTIP and the related international "contracts" are prepared and going and what's the amount of public discussion, mutual agreements and mutual interest (unlike master-slave unquestionable intrest)).

    Asimov's ridiculous, if taken literally, "laws of robotics", are laws of a naive "master" who's inferior than the "slave", but his "ethics", "moral" is even lower.

    The even earlier classics "RUR" of Chapek is another illustration of the "ethics" of the masters who treat everybody else as instruments and slaves, including the people who are not from the masters castes.

    ...


    So, English and US scientists - where were you when your imperialistic political leaders enslaved or conquered the other countries or made them dependent and not-free?

    Where were you to give your pretentious authority bullshit speeches when the rest of the world needed you???

    ..

    Guys, you, the sick "MASTERS of the world", you are not "the humanity" and you are not the "voice of humanity".


    The exploiters of the world, the ones who believe that all nations and people around the world "owe" them to SERVE them, because you they are the "superior" ones or because they are more  "civilized" or something...

    The world knows, that actually you just have bigger guns, you are more aggressive and "less-ethical", your political believe is that killing, threatening and robbing the other people is "free" for you, because you are "higher" etc.


    Let's pray to God that it's not you who define the "machine ethics" - and that there's not one only "ethics" (i.e. a TOTALITARIAN rule that you set).

    Let's hope that you won't define AI's ethics, because in your hands its endangered to be naive, blind, totalitarian, one-directional and egocentrical to your own profit that makes the other people your slaves.


    ...

    * Not that the ENG and US are the only countries/political and military authorities who "threaten the future of humanity" and not that they are the only ones which are dangerous for the "survival of the human kind"... Quotes due to the pretentiousness of these "guru sayings", like coming from a Hollywood "blockbuster" apocalyptic bullshit movie, made like for mentally-retarded viewers or for children below 11 years of age.



    ...

    SourcesBusiness Accelerated  - Meet Amelia, the AI Platform That Could Change the Future of IT: http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/245827

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_military_bases

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=number+of+US+army+bases&src=IE-TopResult&FORM=IE11TR&conversationid=

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22number+of+US+military+bases+in+the+world%22&src=IE-TopResult&FORM=IE11TR&conversationid=

    "number of US military bases in the world"

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/sep/14/ron-paul/ron-paul-says-us-has-military-personnel-130-nation/


    Words: AGI ethics, AI ethics, ... етика на мислещата машина, мислещи машини, ...


    See also from Todor Arnaudov:

    "Philosophical and Interdisciplinary Discussion on General Intelligence, AGI and Superintelligence Safety and Human Moral | Cognitive Origins of the Concepts of Human Soul and its (...) ", 20-th of February 2012

    http://artificial-mind.blogspot.com/2012/02/philosophical-and-interdisciplinary.html

    Read More