tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5038575496362915977.post4912442898799468178..comments2023-04-02T13:55:23.241+03:00Comments on Artificial Mind - Interdisciplinary Research Institute<br><b>СВЕЩЕНИЯТ СМЕТАЧ</b>: What's going on? Everything! | Predictions | The Software Infrastructure | Creativity | Insights | L.O.P.T. - I.A.A.O.CTodor "Tosh" Arnaudov - Twenkidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04922120675725429792noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5038575496362915977.post-77362158543267193292014-03-03T10:46:37.393+02:002014-03-03T10:46:37.393+02:00Hi abhi, thanks for your comment - it depends what...Hi abhi, thanks for your comment - it depends what you mean by "meditating" and "syntactic manner". <br /><br />If reflection and introspection is meditation, than I do. Otherwise, I don't follow particular spiritual movements or something. <br /><br />If the syntax can be multidimensional and can be spread in time and space (time being one of the dimensions), then I think that I could, however Natural Language without addressing a real model of mind would not be appropriate - an artificial mind has to be built in order to allow the syntax to address the modules and what they do.<br /><br />Also the syntax would be a description of a process ("a serialization") - a big representations, flow, transformations, recalls etc.<br /><br />...<br /><br />If you mean something related to qualia or whatever - I assume that there are things that cannot be measured or converted out of their concrete real physical context, there are things that we couldn't know or represent differently than their lowest level representation, I call this level: "machine language of the Universe".<br /><br />However that phenomenon has two sides.<br /><br />An electronic machine cannot "feel" exactly the way humans feel due to its different physical substrate, however for the same reasons humans cannot feel what a machine feels.<br /><br />Claiming that machines cannot feel, because they are not humans, would imply that humans feel or whatever *because they are humans*, implying - because of their specific physical substrate and physical processes (or something religious or whatever).<br /><br />If humans say thet machines don't have qualia or feelings, and they can feel machines feelings as "1 and 0" or whatever, a thinking machine that is smart enough could answer in a similar manner that humans feelings are just "neurotransmitters, hormones, proteins, neurons, blood pressure, " or like "1 and 0" - just "excitation and inhibition", and that humans are just "a piece of flesh".Todor "Tosh" Arnaudov - Twenkidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04922120675725429792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5038575496362915977.post-45522834807195783452014-03-02T17:47:43.706+02:002014-03-02T17:47:43.706+02:00do you meditate my friend?
if yes how would you ex...do you meditate my friend?<br />if yes how would you explain this process in humans in a syntactic manner?<br />if no, then sorry to bother you.abhihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05219315429188944933noreply@blogger.com